欢迎访问 外汇EA下载与MT4/MT5自动交易资源 - 聚合外汇EA、黄金EA、量化交易工具与自动化交易实战内容。
登录 注册

平研足系统 (Heiken-Ashi System)

author emer | 0 人阅读 | 0 人评论 |
来源:ForexFactory · Trading Systems · 原帖链接
原帖作者:Dreamliner
发布日期:First Post: Jan 16, 2007 10:58am
Greetings,

I, like many others, have been searching for the perfect trading system, and I believe I have found it. I'm writing to ask you to examine this system and provide any constructive feedback that you might have.

When I say "perfect" trading system, I do not mean to imply that it has no losses, but what I mean is that it is "perfect" for my trading style and my 3 requirements.

Here is a list of the requirements that I had set out for the system, followed by the system itself, and then I will attach the only indicator I use:

Requirements:
1. Must be "set it and forget it" system, as I am in the air 3-4 days a week and cannot monitor the markets intraday.

2. Must catch all major trends.

3. Must handle ranging markets acceptably.

Indicator: Heiken-Ashi Smoothed set to 2-3-6-2.

Trading System:

Entry: 0000 GMT (7:00 PM Eastern time).

Enter in direction of previous Heiken-Ashi candle (blue=long, red=short)

Stop Loss: 50 pips

Take Profit: 55 Pips

Money management:

Start with .10/pip (1000 units at Oanda) or micro lot for every $3,000.00.
double up on every loss, maximum 5 losses

Backtesting:

I have backtested this system for the months of June through October 2006, and am continuing to backtest for Novemer and December. I will post the results in a spreadsheet on the next post down.

Summary: Out of the 5 months backtested this system produced the equivalent of 3414 pips. I say the "equivalent of" because when I would "double up" on a loss I had to put twice the number of pips actually one, so the spreadsheet would equal the dollar amount won correctly.

Concern: Many people say that doubling after a loss is dangerous and risky. To alleviate some of the risk I start with very minimal lot sizes. Obviously this has the adverse affect of not growing the account very rapidly when you get a string of all winners. But this adverse affect seems to be offset by the reality that you really never have a losing trade because all losses are more than offset by the doubling up of the winners.

Any feedback you have would be appreciated, or if anyone is able to test this system back several years with backtesting software, please let me know.

Thank you.

Mike

📦 帖子附件汇总 (22)

以下是回帖中所有共享的附件(22 个,已去重)。

🔐
请登录后参与评论
注册满12小时后评论,即可解锁附件下载
立即登录